top of page

The Activity-Progress Gap

Too often organizations mistake motion for progress. Reports were generated. Meetings were held. Approvals were routed. But activity alone does not move an objective forward. Progress is effective movement toward the objective. Everything else is just effort in motion. The same principle applies to internal controls.

A control’s value is not measured by how often it operates, but by whether it can actually detect, prevent, or correct what it was designed to address. Controls are not decoration designed to create the appearance of governance. Yet many controls create a dangerous illusion: people feel secure simply because “something is happening.”

The real questions are: If something goes wrong, would the control actually detect it? If approvals are overridden, can the system truly prevent or identify it? Does the activity of the control align with progress toward the objective?

The same mindset applies to audit planning.

💭 Ask: “What does meaningful progress actually look like?”


Recent Posts

See All
The Risk of Control Obsolescence

One of the lesser discussed challenges in enterprise risk management is that controls can become obsolete without becoming obviously ineffective. A control may continue to operate exactly as designed

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page